Photo:1
Photo:2
Photo:3
Photo:4
Photo:1 Photo:2 Photo:3 Photo:4 |
| Avoiding disputes | |
| 2>
Shortcut:
WP:Discussion
A variety of methods exist for helping to positively resolve disputes, before using formal processes or third-party intervention. Disputes or grievances should always be reacted to in the first instance by approaching, in good faith, the editor or editors concerned and explaining what you find objectionable and why you think so. This can be done on the talk page of the article or on the user page.
Tags:Shortcut,Talk,Help, | |
| Focus on content | |
| 3>
Shortcut:
WP:FOC
Further information: Wikipedia:Editing policy
The most important first step is to focus on content, and not on editors. Wikipedia is built upon the principle of collaboration and assuming that the efforts of others are in good faith is important to any community.
When you find a passage in an article that you find is biased or inaccurate, improve it if you can. If that is not easily possible, and you disagree with a point of view expressed in an article, don't just delete it. Rather, balance it with what you think is neutral. Note that unreferenced text may be tagged or removed because of our policy on Verifiability.
To help other editors understand the reasoning behind your edits, always explain your changes in the edit summary. If an edit is potentially contentious, explain why you made the change and how it improves the article. If your reasoning is complex, add a section to the talk page of the article to explain it and refer to that section in the edit summary. If your edit gets reverted, you can discuss the reversion with other editors on the talk page.
In summary: Don't take others' actions personally. Explain to them what you're doing, and always be prepared to change your mind.
Tags:Wp:foc,Wikipedia:editing Policy,Verifiability,Policy,Editing Policy,Wikipedia, | |
| Stay cool | |
| 3>
Policy shortcut:
WP:DISENGAGE
Most situations are not urgent. Please give both yourself and the other party some time. Often it helps to just take a deep breath and sleep on it. Don't worry! You can always fix the problem later. (You can go back to the page history of an article at any time, to find the version of the article that you last worked on, and compare that to the current version to see whether there are still things that you'd like put in or taken out.)
Take a long term view. In due course you will probably be able to return and carry on editing it, when the previous problems no longer exist and the editor you were in dispute with might themselves move on. In the meantime the disputed article will evolve, other editors may become interested and they will have different perspectives if the issue comes up again.
This is particularly helpful when disputing with new users as it gives them a chance to familiarize themselves with Wikipedia's policy and culture. Focus your contributions on another article where you can make constructive progress.
Tags:Wp:disengage,Page History,New Users, | |
| 3>
Stay in the top three sections of this pyramid.
Further information: Wikipedia:Negotiation
When discussing an issue, remember to stay cool. If you encounter rude or inappropriate behavior, don't respond likewise. Take the other editor's perspective into account. Assume that an editor is acting in good faith until it's absolutely clear that they're not. It's at that point where you should consider dispute resolution processes that involve third parties.
Talking to other parties is not a formality; it's an imperative to the smooth running of any community. Not discussing will make people less sympathetic to your position and may prevent you from effectively using later stages in dispute resolution. In contrast, sustained discussion and serious negotiation between the parties, even if not immediately (or even remotely) successful, shows that you are trying to find a solution.
Also consider negotiating a truce or compromise. This is also important if you intend to solicit outside opinions because it allows others to consider the issue fairly without the confusion of constant ongoing edits.
Tags:Negotiation,Wikipedia:negotiation,Stay Cool,Assume That An Editor Is Acting In Good Faith,Imperative,Truce,Compromise, | |
| Seeking preliminary advice and feedback to resolve the dispute | |
| 2>
Further information: Wikipedia:Requesting dispute resolution
If the previous steps fail to resolve the dispute, try one of the following methods. Which ones you choose and in what order depends on the nature of the dispute and the preferences of people involved.
Tags:Wikipedia:requesting Dispute Resolution, | |
| Seek some general advice | |
| 3>
The Dispute resolution noticeboard can help diffuse small content and conduct issues, and assist in pointing people to the best forum for resolving larger issues. The noticeboard is a good first point of call for disputes where the nature of the dispute is unclear and in need of clarification. It can also assist if the dispute needs raising at another venue. This noticeboard is not designed to retake existing disputes; the need to discuss issues in a calm and civilised manner is important.
The noticeboard is monitored by users experienced in resolving disputes, so they are able to assist you in resolving the matter at hand.
Tags:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard,Retake Existing Disputes, | |
| Editor assistance | |
| 3>
Editor assistance helps editors find someone experienced to provide you one-on-one advice and feedback. While not a required part of dispute resolution, it is designed to help you understand how to clearly and civilly express your views and work toward consensus. You may request an assistant's help at any time, whether you're involved in dispute resolution or not. Assistants can also help you find the best way to resolve your dispute or issue.
Tags:Consensus,Editor Assistance, | |
| Wikiquette assistance | |
| 3>
Turn to Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance for impolite, uncivil or other difficult communications with editors. First, however, consider ignoring incivility – you can often get much more accomplished by rising above uncivil comments and staying focused on the task at hand.
Tags:Wikipedia:wikiquette,Wikipedia:wikiquette Assistance,Ignoring Incivility,Civility, | |
| RfCN | |
| 3>
Requests for comment on usernames is the main avenue for bringing attention to usernames which may be inappropriate.
Tags:Requests For Comment On Usernames, | |
| Resolving content disputes | |
| 2>
Further information: Wikipedia:Requesting dispute resolution
If the previous steps fail to resolve the dispute, but the dispute has been identified as a content dispute, any of the following methods can be tried. Such disputes often involve questions over whether particular content in an article (or proposed content for an article) are in compliance with site policies (such as WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, and so on).
Tags:Wp:v,Wp:rs,Wp:npov,Policies, | |
| Ask for a third opinion | |
| 3>
If you need neutral outside opinions in a dispute involving only two editors, turn to Wikipedia:Third opinion.
Tags:Wikipedia:third Opinion, | |
| Ask about the subject | |
| 3>
Ask at a subject-specific Wikipedia:WikiProject talk page. Usually, such projects are listed on top of the article talk page.
Tags: | |
| Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard | |
| 3>
Policy shortcut:
WP:SEEKHELP
If your dispute is related to one of the following topics, you may wish to post about it in one of the below locations, to get the opinions of other editors familiar with similar disputes. There is also a new noticeboard that can help direct you to the best noticeboard for your questions or issues that need to be addressed, it is called the Dispute resolution noticeboard. It can also be used for resolving simple disputes regarding conduct or content, but isn't necessarily the best forum to take complex issues. It can help point you in the right direction for these matters, however.
Specialised content issues
Biographies of Living Persons noticeboard – to raise questions and alerts about possible problems with a living person's biography
Conflict of Interest (COI) noticeboard – to ask about possible COI
Ethnic and cultural conflicts noticeboard – for issues related to national, religious, ethnic, or other cultural conflicts
Sockpuppet investigations – for help in tracking down sockpuppets
General content issues
External links noticeboard – to raise questions and alerts about external links (including those that are not being used to verify article content)
Fringe theories noticeboard – to report theories that may be being given undue weight in articles
Neutrality noticeboard – for discussion of whether or not parts of an article are meeting WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE
No Original Research noticeboard – to raise questions and alerts about material that might be original research or original synthesis
Notability noticeboard – for discussion of whether or not a subject is notable
Reliable Sources noticeboard – for discussion of whether or not a source is reliable
Tags:Wp:seekhelp,Biographies Of Living Persons Noticeboard,Conflict Of Interest (coi) Noticeboard,Ethnic And Cultural Conflicts Noticeboard,Sockpuppet Investigations,Sockpuppets,External Links Noticeboard,External Links,Fringe Theories Noticeboard,Undue Weight,Neutrality Noticeboard,Wp:undue,No Original Research Noticeboard,Original Research,Original Synthesis,Notability Noticeboard,Notable,Reliable Sources Noticeboard,Reliable,External Link,No Original Research,Biographies Of Living Persons,Notability,Conflict Of Interest, | |
| Informal mediation | |
| 3>
If things are getting a bit tricky, it might be useful to ask some cool heads to look in and help out. Sometimes editors who provide third opinions or respond to requests for comments may be willing to help mediate a dispute, if it is requested. The Mediation Cabal also assists in settling disputes without turning to formal mediation, and is a good place to learn dispute resolution techniques.
Tags:Requests For Comments,Mediation,Mediation Cabal, | |
| Formal mediation | |
| 3>
Request formal mediation of the dispute from the Mediation Committee. Mediation is a voluntary process in which a neutral person works with the parties to a dispute. The mediator helps guide the parties into reaching an agreement that can be acceptable to everyone. When requesting formal mediation, be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute using the steps listed above, and that all parties to the dispute are in agreement to mediate. Mediation cannot take place if all parties are not willing to take part. Mediation is only for disputes about Article Content, not for complaints about user conduct.
See Wikipedia:Requests for mediation#File and Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide for guidance in filing a request.
Tags:Request Formal Mediation,Mediation Committee,Wikipedia:requests For Mediation/guide, | |
| RfC through article talk pages | |
| 3>
Requests for comment through article talk pages is the remaining avenue for requesting outside input on article content or proposed article content. Unlike mediation, RfC through article talk pages can still proceed even if a party is unwilling to participate.
Tags: | |
| Resolving user conduct disputes | |
| 2>
If the dispute has been identified as a dispute which involves user conduct, one of the following methods can be tried. Such disputes often involve complaints concerning the actions of a user (such as how an editor edits or the comments that editor makes during talk page discussions).
Tags: | |
| Sensitive issues and functionary actions | |
| 3>
See also: Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee, Wikipedia:CheckUser, Wikipedia:Oversight, Wikipedia:Harassment, and Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team
A small number of disputes involve sensitive or non-public information. These include issues where an Arbitrator, Checkuser or Oversighter has stated a privacy issue exists in the case, and disputes where there is a concern of a sensitive or private nature. Examples:
Non-public details - Issues where details and evidence are not accessible to all participants or to the community as a whole. This can also happen due to copyright or privacy reasons, BLP, or when the material is on an unsuitable external link;
"Outing" concerns - When discussion may in effect mean "outing", for example if there is a concern that a user is editing with a secret conflict of interest and the evidence would tend to identify them;
Serious matters - The issue involves legal concerns, harassment, or allegations that are very serious or perhaps defamatory;
Advice on divisive and sensitive issues - The issue may potentially be very divisive and advice is needed on how best to handle it. (sock-puppetry by an administrator is one example)
Disputes or issues of this kind should usually be referred to the functionaries mailing list or Arbitration Committee. In some cases it may be possible to seek advice from an uninvolved trusted administrator by IRC, email or other private means.
Tags:Arbitration,Wikipedia:arbitration Committee,Wikipedia:checkuser,Wikipedia:oversight,Wikipedia:volunteer Response Team,Arbitrator,Checkuser,Oversighter,Blp,Outing,Sock-puppetry By An Administrator,Functionaries Mailing List,Arbitration Committee,Harassment,Privacy, | |
| Actions tagged as CheckUser, Oversight, OTRS or Arbitration Committee | |
| 4>
Where an action is marked as CheckUser, Oversight, OTRS or Arbitration Committee, that action should not be reverted without checking beforehand. The presumption is that they have a good reason, and those aware of the reason may need time to recheck, consult, and respond. Sometimes the relevant talk page or other wiki pages will have more details and these are always a good first place to check.
Such actions, if disputed, should initially be raised (by email if necessary) with the agent or functionary concerned. Where a dispute about OTRS actions cannot be resolved in this manner, it should be referred to the OTRS administrators. Where a dispute about CheckUser and Oversighter actions cannot be resolved in this manner, it should be referred to the functionaries mailing list or the Audit Subcommittee where appropriate. Disputes about ArbCom actions should be referred to the Arbitration Committee.
Tags:Otrs Administrators,Audit Subcommittee,Administrators, | |
| RfC/U | |
| 3>
Requests for comment on user conduct is the main avenue for disputes about user conduct. Requests for comment on user conduct have minimum requirements that need to be satisfied: at least two users must have tried (and failed) to resolve the problem with the user on the user's talk page.
Tags:Requests For Comment On User Conduct, | |
| Last resort: Arbitration | |
| 3>
Further information: Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee, Wikipedia:Arbitration policy, and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration
See also: Wikipedia:Arbitration guide
If you have taken all other reasonable steps to resolve the dispute, and the dispute is not over the content of an article, you can request arbitration. Be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute by other means. Arbitration differs from mediation in that the Arbitration Committee will consider the case and issue a decision, instead of merely assisting the parties in reaching an agreement. If the issue is decided by arbitration, you will be expected to abide by the result. If the case involves serious user misconduct, arbitration may result in a number of serious consequences up to totally banning someone from editing, as laid out in the arbitration policy. Note that arbitration is normally for disputes about user conduct, while mediation is normally for disputes about article content.
Tags:Request Arbitration,Wikipedia:requests For Arbitration,Wikipedia:arbitration Guide,Arbitration Policy, | |
| For urgent situations | |
| 2>
Some situations can be sufficiently urgent or serious that dispute resolution steps are not equipped to resolve the issue. Such situations can be forwarded to the appropriate venue.
To request permanent deletion of personal information: Wikipedia:Requests for oversight.
To request an unblock (if you are blocked): place the code: {{unblock| your reason for unblock }} on your talk page. You may also contact the blocking admin via email (navigate to their userpage or user talk page and click "E-mail this user").
To report vandalism: Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
To report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory: Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
To report suspected sockpuppetry: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations.
To report urgent violations of Wikipedia's policies on Personal Attacks: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
To report edit warring: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR.
To report a user's conduct which needs other urgent attention from an administrator: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard.
The Administrators' Noticeboards are not the place to raise disputes over content, or reports of abusive behaviour. Reports that do not belong at these noticeboards will be closed, and discussions will need to be re-posted at an appropriate forum, including the new dispute resolution noticeboard. Administrators are not referees, and have limited authority to deal with abusive editors.
Tags:Deletion,Wikipedia:requests For Oversight,Wikipedia:administrator Intervention Against Vandalism,Wikipedia:usernames For Administrator Attention,Wikipedia:sockpuppet Investigations,Personal Attacks,Wikipedia:administrators' Noticeboard/incidents,Wikipedia:administrators' Noticeboard/3rr,Wikipedia:administrators' Noticeboard,Edit Warring, | |
| Words of caution | |
| 2>
Dispute resolution is sometimes used by editors to try to game the system. This generally backfires badly. Remember that dispute resolution mechanisms are ultimately there to enable editors to collaboratively write an encyclopedia – not to win personal or political battles.
Tags:Game The System, | |
| See also | |
| 2>
Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
Wikipedia:Candor
Wikipedia:Disruptive editing
Wikipedia:Don't be a fanatic
Wikipedia:Edit war
Wikipedia:Etiquette
Wikipedia:Mea culpa
Wikipedia:Navigating conflict
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Situations and handling
Wikipedia:No angry mastodons
Wikipedia:NPOV dispute
Wikipedia:Precedents
Wikipedia:WikiWar
Wikipedia:WikiProject Dispute Resolution
MeatBall:ConflictResolution
Help:Talkspace draft
v
d
e
Key Wikipedia policies and guidelines
Overview
Five pillars
Policies and guidelines
List of policies and guidelines
List of policies
List of guidelines
Project-wide principles
What Wikipedia is not
Editing policy
Consensus
Dispute resolution
Ignore all rules
Core content policies
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Other content policies
Article titles
Biographies of living persons
Deletion
Content guidelines
Citing sources
Disambiguation
Do not create hoaxes
Do not include copies of primary sources
Identifying reliable sources
Notability
Map conventions
Patent nonsense
Behavioural policies
Child protection
Civility
Edit warring
Harassment
No legal threats
No personal attacks
Ownership of articles
Sock puppetry
Behavioural guidelines
Assume good faith
Conflict of interest
Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
Etiquette
Gaming the system
Please do not bite the newcomers
Editing guidelines
Article size
Be bold
Hatnotes
Signatures
Talk page guidelines
Subpages
User pages
WikiProjects
Style conventions
Manual of Style
Accessibility
Dates and numbers
Layout
Lead section
Lists
Linking
Classification guidelines
Categories, lists, and navigation templates
Categorization
Template namespace
Wikimedia Foundation
Privacy
Licensing and copyright
(List of policies)
Policies
Guidelines
v
d
e
Essays on Wikipedia civility
The basics
How to be civil
Compromise
Accepting other users
Duty
Enjoy yourself
Honor system
Thank you
Apology
Truce
Forgive and forget
No vested contributors
Staying cool when the editing gets hot
Overzealous deletion
Content removal
Divisiveness
Philosophy
An uncivil environment is a poor environment
How many legs does a horse have?
You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
Wikipedia is not about winning
The Last Word
The grey zone
You are probably not a lexicologist or a lexicographer
Writing for the opponent
There is no common sense
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a vandal
Walls of text
Nobody cares
Witchhunt
Shadowless Fists of Death!
You don't own Wikipedia
Dos
Adopt a quiet role
Assume good faith
Assume the assumption of good faith
Assume no clue
Assume clue
Avoid personal remarks
Avoid rancor
Avoid the word "vandal"
Award barnstars
Call a spade a spade
Candor
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
Deny recognition
Encourage full discussions
In praise of 1RR
Revert only when necessary
Get over it
How to lose
Mind your own business
Discussing cruft
Keep it down to earth
Revert, block, ignore
Don'ts
Arguments to avoid in edit wars
Don't be inconsiderate
Please do not bite the newcomers
Don't call a spade a spade
Don't call the kettle black
Don't take the bait
Do not insult the vandals
Just drop it
Don't edit war over the colour of templates
Don't be ashamed
Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
Don't feed the divas
Don't stuff beans up your nose
Don't spite your face
Don't revert due to "no consensus"
Don't call things cruft
No angry mastodons
Don't be an ostrich
Don't template the regulars
Don't be a fanatic
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
Don't fight fire with fire
Don't be prejudiced
Don't remind others of past misdeeds
Wiki relations
WikiLove
WikiHate
WikiCrime
WikiBullying
WikiPeace
WikiLawyering
WikiHarassment
We live in Wikiville
About essays
The value of essays
The difference between policies, guidelines and essays
Essays are not policy
Don't cite essays as if they were policy
Quote your own essay
Essays
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution&oldid=473687637"
Categories: Wikipedia policyWikipedia civility essaysWikipedia dispute resolutionWikipedia procedural policyHidden categories: Semi-protected project pages
Personal tools
Log in / create account
Namespaces
Project page
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
Actions
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact Wikipedia
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Print/export
Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version
Languages
Afrikaans
አማርኛ
العربية
Azərbaycanca
Brezhoneg
Български
Català
Česky
Deutsch
فارسی
Français
Galego
עברית
한국어
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano
ქართული
Қазақша
Magyar
Македонски
മലയാളം
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
日本語
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Sicilianu
Simple English
Slovenčina
Српски / Srpski
Svenska
తెలుగు
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Việt
中文
This page was last modified on 28 January 2012 at 14:05.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply.
See Terms of use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.Contact us
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Mobile view
if ( window.isMSIE55 ) fixalpha();
if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
mw.loader.load(["mediawiki.user", "mediawiki.util", "mediawiki.page.ready", "mediawiki.legacy.wikibits", "mediawiki.legacy.ajax", "mediawiki.legacy.mwsuggest", "ext.gadget.wmfFR2011Style", "ext.vector.collapsibleNav", "ext.vector.collapsibleTabs", "ext.vector.editWarning", "ext.vector.simpleSearch", "ext.UserBuckets", "ext.articleFeedback.startup", "ext.articleFeedbackv5.startup", "ext.markAsHelpful"]);
}
if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
mw.user.options.set({"ccmeonemails":0,"cols":80,"date":"default","diffonly":0,"disablemail":0,"disablesuggest":0,"editfont":"default","editondblclick":0,"editsection":1,"editsectiononrightclick":0,"enotifminoredits":0,"enotifrevealaddr":0,"enotifusertalkpages":1,"enotifwatchlistpages":0,"extendwatchlist":0,"externaldiff":0,"externaleditor":0,"fancysig":0,"forceeditsummary":0,"gender":"unknown","hideminor":0,"hidepatrolled":0,"highlightbroken":1,"imagesize":2,"justify":0,"math":1,"minordefault":0,"newpageshidepatrolled":0,"nocache":0,"noconvertlink":0,"norollbackdiff":0,"numberheadings":0,"previewonfirst":0,"previewontop":1,"quickbar":5,"rcdays":7,"rclimit":50,"rememberpassword":0,"rows":25,"searchlimit":20,"showhiddencats":false,"showjumplinks":1,"shownumberswatching":1,"showtoc":1,"showtoolbar":1,"skin":"vector","stubthreshold":0,"thumbsize":4,"underline":2,"uselivepreview":0,"usenewrc":0,"watchcreations":1,"watchdefault":0,"watchdeletion":0,"watchlistdays":3,"watchlisthideanons":0,
"watchlisthidebots":0,"watchlisthideliu":0,"watchlisthideminor":0,"watchlisthideown":0,"watchlisthidepatrolled":0,"watchmoves":0,"wllimit":250,"flaggedrevssimpleui":1,"flaggedrevsstable":0,"flaggedrevseditdiffs":true,"flaggedrevsviewdiffs":false,"vector-simplesearch":1,"useeditwarning":1,"vector-collapsiblenav":1,"usebetatoolbar":1,"usebetatoolbar-cgd":1,"wikilove-enabled":1,"variant":"en","language":"en","searchNs0":true,"searchNs1":false,"searchNs2":false,"searchNs3":false,"searchNs4":false,"searchNs5":false,"searchNs6":false,"searchNs7":false,"searchNs8":false,"searchNs9":false,"searchNs10":false,"searchNs11":false,"searchNs12":false,"searchNs13":false,"searchNs14":false,"searchNs15":false,"searchNs100":false,"searchNs101":false,"searchNs108":false,"searchNs109":false,"gadget-wmfFR2011Style":1});;mw.user.tokens.set({"editToken":"+\\","watchToken":false});;mw.loader.state({"user.options":"ready","user.tokens":"ready"});
/* cache key: enwiki:resourceloader:filter:minify-js:4:b41a86ec4e0fe8329bc3ce917e792339 */
}
Tags:Assume Good Faith,Staying Cool When The Editing Gets Hot,Wikipedia Is Not About Winning,Wikipedia:accuracy Dispute,Wikipedia:candor,Wikipedia:disruptive Editing,Wikipedia:don't Be A Fanatic,Wikipedia:edit War,Wikipedia:etiquette,Wikipedia:mea Culpa,Wikipedia:navigating Conflict,Wikipedia:no Angry Mastodons,Wikipedia:npov Dispute,Wikipedia:precedents,Wikipedia:wikiwar,Wikipedia:wikiproject Dispute Resolution,Help:talkspace Draft,Key Wikipedia Policies And Guidelines,Five Pillars,Policies And Guidelines,List Of Policies And Guidelines,List Of Policies,List Of Guidelines,What Wikipedia Is Not,Ignore All Rules,Neutral Point Of View,Article Titles,Citing Sources,Disambiguation,Do Not Create Hoaxes,Do Not Include Copies Of Primary Sources,Identifying Reliable Sources,Map Conventions,Patent Nonsense,Child Protection,No Legal Threats,No Personal Attacks,Ownership Of Articles,Sock Puppetry,Do Not Disrupt Wikipedia To Illustrate A Point,Etiquette,Gaming The System,Please Do Not Bite The Newcomers,Article Size,Be Bold,Hatnotes,Signatures,Talk Page Guidelines,Subpages,User Pages,Wikiprojects,Manual Of Style,Accessibility,Dates And Numbers,Layout,Lead Section,Lists,Linking,Categories, Lists, And Navigation Templates, | |
zote monety |